Gwrthwynebu

1 Ymgynghoriad ar Cynllun Datblygu Lleol Newydd

ID sylw: 6527

Derbyniwyd: 11/03/2026

Respondent ID: 1519

Ymatebydd: Mr Chris Williams

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Effeithiau ar y Gymraeg:

I fail to see the relevance

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Dinas Powys will lose its identity as a village.
Loss of green belt boundary between Dinas Powys, Llandough and Penarth.
Local schools and GP surgeries are at capacity/overs-subscribed. No ongoing consultation with GP services.
Water run off into the Cadoxton River which has burst and flooded existing homes many times. More discharge of raw sewage into the sea.
Impact on wildlife habitats.
The justification for the site based on active travel and public transport has proven to be incorrect. There is limited access to Eastbrook train station. With traffic levels of Cardiff Rd, bus travel does not offer any advantage and the proposed traffic light system will only add more issues.
Likely to add 500 additional cars to Cardiff Rd which is already over capacity and has no planned improvements.
Impact of increased pollution on local schools.
Additional traffic will affect emergency services.
Highways objected to both the proposal for 800 homes and 250 homes.
No Transport Assessment has been provided.
Not a viable Active Travel site.
Strategic Flooding Assessment is meant to record details of recent flood events but did not specifically detail the flooding of 100 homes.
Has a catchment wide hydraulic model been commissioned, completed and agreed with NRW and does it show no increase in flood risk to existing properties?
The use of SuDS will only add more water into the flood plain. Are they viable given soil and ground water constraints? Who is going to be responsible for maintaining them?
It would also be good to know the number of raw sewage discharges since all these new housing developments were finished.
What evidence is there and where is it that 250 houses are needed in Eastbrook?
Having been turned down before, what were the reasons to do so and what has changed to make it viable now?
Have the Vale council exhausted all the key sites outlined in the previous LDP and if not why not?
Have the Vale council used all their rolled forward housing sites?
Have the Vale council carried out a Sequential Test, thereby proving there are no lower risk sites available?
Has an Exception Test been carried out to ensure the development will be made safe throughout its lifetime without increasing risks of flooding elsewhere? Were these carried out in the case of Woodlands, Scholars Park and Caerwent Close?
From Persimmons marketing brief 50 homes will be affordable housing to be managed by a housing association, what is classed as affordable housing?
With the elderly population increasing and the birth rate falling how do you justify this need and what proportion will be age friendly?
250 houses are not what the elderly need they want to be able to downsize to age friendly housing i.e. bungalows, what are the Vale council doing about this?
I understand that both the UK and Welsh Governments are 'ordering' house building but that is mainly to boost the economy by getting Britain building but repurposing existing empty buildings does that too. Cardiff have just done that with an office block in Cardiff Bay, so instead of making the east side of the Vale part of Cardiff why not do that?

Atodiadau: