Gwrthwynebu
1 Ymgynghoriad ar Cynllun Datblygu Lleol Newydd
ID sylw: 6427
Derbyniwyd: 10/03/2026
Respondent ID: 1564
Ymatebydd: Ms Jen Sullivan
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
The objector notes the site was previously rejected (2011-2026 LDP) due to "insurmountable constraints," including countryside intrusion and highway issues, which they argue remain unresolved.
The site sits entirely within a designated Green Wedge. The objector argues that developing ~250 homes would result in the physical coalescence of Dinas Powys and Llandough, violating PPW Paragraph 3.78 and undermining the original purpose of the designation.
There is a challenge regarding the "Candidate Site Assessment" (BP18A). The objector points out that smaller, adjacent sites (e.g., Sites 356, 419, 423) were rejected for Green Wedge harm, yet this larger site was progressed without clear justification for the differential treatment.
The objector claims the Station Road/Cardiff Road junction is already at capacity. They argue the RLDP lacks updated junction modelling, cumulative impact assessments, or funded mitigation.
The "aspirational" shift to active travel is challenged. Concerns include the lack of accessibility at Eastbrook Station (no lift/crossing) and the insufficiency of current bus/rail services to meet increased demand.
Concerns are raised over the lack of a settlement-specific capacity study. The objector highlights a perceived lack of transparency regarding how previous Section 106 contributions (e.g., Taylor Wimpey) were utilized to increase local capacity.
There is no confirmed capacity or infrastructure sequencing plan from Dwr Cymru Welsh Water for wastewater and sewerage upgrades.
The site is described as prone to surface water flooding. The objector argues that developing the site will displace water, increasing flood risk to the existing village, and that current modelling fails to account for climate change allowances.
The objector contests current monitoring, noting it was conducted in open fields rather than at sensitive receptors (like schools). They argue that 250 homes will alter dispersion dynamics and worsen air quality.
The site is identified as Grade 2/3a (BMV) land. The objector argues the RLDP fails to demonstrate the "overriding need" required by PPW to justify the loss of high-quality agricultural soil.
The objection lists specific protected or notable species (Bats, Tawny Owls, Sparrowhawks, etc.) whose natural habitat would be lost.
The proposal is viewed as a disproportionate extension that ignores local character and settlement identity.
The objector contends the allocation is "numbers-driven" rather than based on sensitive placemaking principles or community wellbeing.
It is respectfully requested that:
The allocation of Site SP4 KS2 be removed.
Objection to Allocation HG1 KS2 - Land North of Dinas Powys (SP4 KS2) This submission sets out an objection to the allocation of Site SP4 KS2 (Land North of Dinas Powys) within the Vale of Glamorgan Replacement Local Development Plan (RLDP). The allocation is considered unsound, inconsistent, and contrary to national planning policy, and is not supported by sufficient settlement-specific evidence.
1. Previously Rejected for the Same Constraints
The site was previously assessed during the 2011-2026 LDP process (Site 1098/CS.1) and rejected at Stage 2 due to "insurmountable constraints." Similarly, candidate site 2036/CS.2 (Land at Eastbrook) was rejected on the grounds that development would:
Represent unacceptable intrusion into the countryside
Promote coalescence between Dinas Powys and Llandough
Be subject to significant highway constraints
No clear evidence has been provided to demonstrate that these constraints have been resolved.
2. Green Wedge Conflict & Risk of Coalescence
The site lies wholly within the designated Green Wedge between Dinas Powys, Penarth and Llandough. The 2011 Green Wedge Background Paper identifies its purposes as:
Preventing settlement coalescence
Protecting open countryside
Maintaining settlement identity
Preserving the setting of built-up areas
The RLDP's Integrated Sustainability Appraisal (2023) confirms Green Wedges continue to protect settlement integrity.
Allocating ~250 homes on this land would materially reduce separation between Dinas Powys and Llandough, directly conflicting with paragraph 3.78 of Planning Policy Wales.
Paragraph 3.64 of Planning Policy Wales requires Green Wedges to be "soundly based." No robust evidence has been presented to justify altering this designation.
Once Green Wedge land is released, it cannot realistically be restored. Approval would create pressure for further incremental loss.
3. Inconsistent Candidate Site Assessment (BP18A) Background Paper BP18A shows clear inconsistencies.
Site SP4 KS2 (Site 444) was progressed, while overlapping or adjacent smaller sites were rejected: Site 356 - Land east of Pen-Y-Turnpike Road (rejected due to Green Wedge harm) Site 419 - Land at The Grange (rejected due to Green Wedge harm)
Site 423 Land North Dinas Powys (rejected due to sporadic countryside intrusion) These sites are smaller and would pose less risk of coalescence than SP4 KS2. The differential treatment lacks explanation and undermines transparency and credibility of the assessment process.
4. Highways, Traffic & Sustainable Transport
Previous Council findings confirmed the Station Road/Cardiff Road junction was operating at capacity. The main road through Dinas Powys is at a standstill in both directions for much of the day. The traffic coming from Penarth will back up due to the increased traffic (approx 500 extra vehicles on the road) resulting from 250 additional houses.
The RLDP does not provide:
Detailed updated junction modelling
Cumulative traffic impact assessment
Funded and deliverable mitigation measures
Planning Policy Wales requires development to avoid severe residual impacts on the road network and promote sustainable transport.
The Plan relies on aspirational measures without demonstrating modal shift sufficient to offset ~250 additional dwellings.
5. Air Quality Concerns
Air quality monitoring was undertaken adjacent to open fields, where pollutant dispersion is naturally favourable.
The survey effectively demonstrated acceptable limits because open land allows dissipation.
Introducing 250 homes would:
Alter dispersion dynamics
Increase vehicle movements
Create potential pollutant accumulation
No post-development dispersion modelling or cumulative emissions modelling has been presented.
There has been no focused monitoring at sensitive receptors such as local primary schools during peak term-time traffic.
6. Flood Risk & Drainage (TAN 15)
Parts of the Eastbrook area have known drainage and flood constraints.
The RLDP:
Defers mitigation to application stage
Does not provide robust cumulative runoff modelling
Does not clearly demonstrate compliance with current TAN 15 requirements including climate change allowances
The site proposed for development floods after the slightest rainfall. If this development did go ahead the water would be diverted toward the rest of the village who already experience severe flooding and the loss and distress that comes with that.
7. Wastewater & Sewerage Infrastructure
There is no published confirmation from Dwr Cymru Welsh Water confirming network and treatment capacity.
The Plan does not identify:
Required upgrades
Funding mechanisms
Delivery timescales
Infrastructure sequencing
Reliance on future upgrades without secured delivery undermines effectiveness.
8. Schools & Community Infrastructure
Previous assessments noted limited school and medical capacity.
Section 106 education contributions from earlier developments (including Taylor Wimpey funding originally linked to nursery and primary provision) have not resulted in clear, transparent delivery of additional school capacity.
Subsequent housing approvals (e.g. Bendricks / Hayes Road) have added pressure without clear education funding alignment.
The RLDP provides no:
Settlement-specific capacity study Confirmed expansion programme
Delivery timetable aligned with housing growth
9. Best and Most Versatile Agricultural Land
The site comprises Grade 2/3a agricultural land (Best and Most Versatile). Planning Policy Wales requires protection of such land unless overriding need is demonstrated. No published BMVassessment or alternatives analysis has been provided.
10. Placemaking & Settlement Character
The proposal represents a disproportionate extension relative to the scale and pattern of Dinas Powys. The allocation appears driven by housing numbers rather than:
Local character Infrastructure capacity
Community wellbeing
Sensitive placemaking principles
11. Loss of natural habitat for local wildlife
The land proposed for development is a natural habitat for many species including: Bats Foxes Tawny Owls Dragon flies Woodpeckers Sparrowhawks Greater Spotted Woodpeckers
12. Active Travel and public transport
The Council offers a narrative of active travel being a reasonable alternative to using vehicles. This has not been thought through properly. Many people have to take children to school, which they could not do by foot on on a bicycle. The same argument goes for people working in areas not accessible by public transport. The bus and train service running through Dinas Powys is insufficient for the residents currently living here so would not cope with the increased demand. The train station at Eastbook does not have a lift or a crossing for people with a physical disability or parents with a pushchair. The route to walk around to the other side of the train station would add an additional 20/30 minutes to the journey on foot.
Overall Conclusion
The allocation of HG1 KS2/SP4 KS2 is unsound because it is:
Not Justified Contradicts established Green Wedge purpose
Inconsistent site assessment
Previously rejected for unresolved constraints
Not Effective Infrastructure capacity (highways, schools, sewerage, drainage) not demonstrated
Over-reliance on future mitigation
Not Consistent with National Policy
Conflicts with Planning Policy Wales Green Wedge policy
Fails to demonstrate sustainable transport compliance
Risks loss of Best and Most Versatile agricultural land
Requested Action
It is respectfully requested that:
The allocation of Site SP4 KS2 be removed.