Gwrthwynebu
1 Ymgynghoriad ar Cynllun Datblygu Lleol Newydd
ID sylw: 6263
Derbyniwyd: 12/03/2026
Respondent ID: 1031
Ymatebydd: Councillor William Hennessy
Cadarn? Heb nodi
No
I disagree with the candidate site because it is poorly located, ignoring increased traffic, drainage, sewage, and infrastructure issues such as healthcare and active travel. Local residents' opinions and traffic flow through Rhoose and Port Road are overlooked, especially considering the new college and potential disruptions. Active travel plans are unrealistic, as walking to the train station in 15 minutes is impractical for the elderly or disabled, and bus services are limited. Additionally, local schools such as Rhoose Primary and Cowbridge secondary are at capacity, so where will all the new pupils go?
HGI-KS3 The reasons for disagreeing with this candidate site is it is located in the wrong place, and no one has taken into account the increase traffic or the increase of drainage and sewage in the area or the lack of infrastructure ie. health or dentist service and the lack of active travel, and have not taken the local residents views in to account and the amount of traffic going through Rhoose and Port Road and have not taken in to account the new college, and the amount of traffic disruption it will have on the residence of Rhoose.
According to your RLDP it saying you would be able to walk to the train station in 15 min, that will not happen if you are elderly or disabled, so your active trave proposals are ridiculous, and there are no buses going to Celtic way and Readers. And there is just 1 bus very hour and 1 train every hour, so how will people get to work if they do not drive.
You say that the to school in Rhoose would have capacity that is not true. Rhoose Primary school is full and South Point has capacity for 90 more pupils and the secondary school is full in Cowbridge so where will all the new kids go