Sylw
1 Ymgynghoriad ar Cynllun Datblygu Lleol Newydd
ID sylw: 5478
Derbyniwyd: 09/03/2026
Respondent ID: 2657
Ymatebydd: Mrs Mary Vincent
I strongly obect to the removal of the existing Green Wedge at the KS1 site on several grounds. The argument that this land is not necessary for the Green Wedge to function is totally at odds with the findings of the inspector in 2015 that it's current boundary was valid and sound. Her conclusion was that the site is a meaningful part of an undeveloped landscape corridor. Removal of this land ignores its key role in supplying connectivity between existing protected landscapes and the further landscapes of the Vale.
I strongly obect to the removal of the existing Green Wedge at the KS1 site on several grounds. The argument that this land is not necessary for the Green Wedge to function is totally at odds with the findings of the inspector in 2015 that it's current boundary was valid and sound. Her conclusion was that the site is a meaningful part of an undeveloped landscape corridor.
Removal of this land ignores its key role in supplying connectivity between existing protected landscapes and the further landscapes of the Vale. Re-evaluating it as 'low grade' is primarily an expedient way of devaluing it in order to diminish its value as Green Wedge.
Their argument relies on minimising its landscape value and treating it as an isolated site. It wholly ignores its role as part of a continuum of open land between Barry and Rhoose. The Green Wedge designation protects function, not just scenic quality.
If the Vale's stated policy of
"ensuring the enhancement of biodiversity, the resilience of ecosystems, and maximising green infrastructure provision are crucial in responding to both the declared Climate and Nature Emergencies"
is to be believed then this development should be removed from their plan.