HG2 (1)
Sylw
1 Ymgynghoriad ar Cynllun Datblygu Lleol Newydd
ID sylw: 4434
Derbyniwyd: 30/01/2026
Respondent ID: 2774
Ymatebydd: Mr Corrado Ruta
Hello, please make sure any development at this site does not impact negatively on the proposed active travel route along the old railway line from Cosmeston to Sully.
Hello, please make sure any development at this site does not impact negatively on the proposed active travel route along the old railway line from Cosmeston to Sully.
Gwrthwynebu
1 Ymgynghoriad ar Cynllun Datblygu Lleol Newydd
ID sylw: 4533
Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2026
Respondent ID: 2841
Ymatebydd: Mr Leon Duke
Cadarn? Heb nodi
This is heritage coastline and should not be considered for housing.
Zero infrastructure to accommodate multiple homes! Sort roads, schooling and shopping facilities before considering more residential housing!
This is heritage coastline and should not be considered for housing.
Zero infrastructure to accommodate multiple homes! Sort roads, schooling and shopping facilities before considering more residential housing!
Gwrthwynebu
1 Ymgynghoriad ar Cynllun Datblygu Lleol Newydd
ID sylw: 4679
Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2026
Respondent ID: 2883
Ymatebydd: Ms Elias Elias
Cadarn? Heb nodi
Developing this land will have a detrimental effect on the environment and the community
Developing this land will have a detrimental effect on the environment and the community
Gwrthwynebu
1 Ymgynghoriad ar Cynllun Datblygu Lleol Newydd
ID sylw: 4757
Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2026
Respondent ID: 2919
Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Hooper
Cadarn? Heb nodi
Traffic concerns. No railway connection.
Unconfirmed cliff stability.
Traffic concerns. No railway connection.
Unconfirmed cliff stability.
Gwrthwynebu
1 Ymgynghoriad ar Cynllun Datblygu Lleol Newydd
ID sylw: 5448
Derbyniwyd: 09/03/2026
Respondent ID: 3263
Ymatebydd: Mr Morgan Williams
Cadarn? Heb nodi
I object to the inclusion of the Cosmeston Upper Farm site in the RLDP because it has not demonstrated that it is viable, deliverable, or compliant with Welsh Government planning requirements. Key issues remain unresolved, including flood risk, lack of a confirmed flood-free or resilient access route, unclear site boundaries due to coastal rollback considerations, and no clear plan for biodiversity enhancement or community land provision. A required Stage 3 Site Specific Viability Assessment has not been transparently completed. Until these matters are properly assessed and resolved, the site should not be rolled forward as a housing allocation.
I object to the inclusion of the Cosmeston Upper Farm site in the RLDP because it has not demonstrated that it is viable, deliverable, or compliant with Welsh Government planning requirements. Key issues remain unresolved, including flood risk, lack of a confirmed flood-free or resilient access route, unclear site boundaries due to coastal rollback considerations, and no clear plan for biodiversity enhancement or community land provision. A required Stage 3 Site Specific Viability Assessment has not been transparently completed. Until these matters are properly assessed and resolved, the site should not be rolled forward as a housing allocation.
Gwrthwynebu
1 Ymgynghoriad ar Cynllun Datblygu Lleol Newydd
ID sylw: 5596
Derbyniwyd: 09/03/2026
Respondent ID: 3226
Ymatebydd: Mr Jonathan Lambert
Cadarn? Heb nodi
The area is not suitable as the land to the west of Upper Cosmeston Farm is heavily contaminated being a former landfill site. There is coastal erosion of the cliffs. The area’s natural beauty will be compromised with it a requirement that the Vale’s Heritage Coast be free from any development which would impact negatively upon its aesthetics. The area is already heavily congested with traffic and an extra 576 cars on the road will have very real consequences for the environment. There is numerous wildlife such as bats and their roosts which will be destroyed.
The area is not suitable as the land to the west of Upper Cosmeston Farm is heavily contaminated being a former landfill site. There is coastal erosion of the cliffs. The area’s natural beauty will be compromised with it a requirement that the Vale’s Heritage Coast be free from any development which would impact negatively upon its aesthetics. The area is already heavily congested with traffic and an extra 576 cars on the road will have very real consequences for the environment. There is numerous wildlife such as bats and their roosts which will be destroyed.
Sylw
1 Ymgynghoriad ar Cynllun Datblygu Lleol Newydd
ID sylw: 6122
Derbyniwyd: 11/03/2026
Respondent ID: 708
Ymatebydd: Barry & Vale Friends of the Earth
Asiant : Barry & Vale Friends of the Earth
Cosmestutline application as approved in March 2024 is still not final. on housing development has not been finalisd. The oEven if that outline was signed, the details are not. It’s included in the RLDP as a landbank site to be rolled forward.
The RLDP inclusion for rolling forward is contrary to the DMM requirement that site-specific allocations have delivery/viability evidence. A Stage 3: Site Specific Viability Assessment is needed, in order to ensure that sites which progress to allocation within the RLDP can satisfy new policy requirements and remain viable and deliverable.
We attach fuller argument.
Cosmestutline application as approved in March 2024 is still not final. on housing development has not been finalisd. The oEven if that outline was signed, the details are not. It’s included in the RLDP as a landbank site to be rolled forward.
The RLDP inclusion for rolling forward is contrary to the DMM requirement that site-specific allocations have delivery/viability evidence. A Stage 3: Site Specific Viability Assessment is needed, in order to ensure that sites which progress to allocation within the RLDP can satisfy new policy requirements and remain viable and deliverable.
We attach fuller argument.