Gwrthwynebu
1 Ymgynghoriad ar Cynllun Datblygu Lleol Newydd
ID sylw: 6381
Derbyniwyd: 10/03/2026
Respondent ID: 3565
Ymatebydd: Mrs Tess Lewis
Cadarn? Heb nodi
1. The unjustified redrawing of the settlement boundary to include candidate site 4069 as it is an intrusion into scarce prime agricultural land.
2. inclusion of this site for affordable housing, is unsustainable and unviable and likely to cause significant irreversible damage to village heritage status.
The inclusion of this site fails to reflect your current planning policies and LDP objectives. It fails on the majority of Impact Sustainability objectives and should not be approved for inclusion in the final LDP. The proposed development will result in additional traffic as 25 houses will result in about 50 extra motor vehicles. This is because of the absence of a bus service for the village with the main road being over a mile from the proposed site. The existing highways in the village do not meet basic safety standards. I do not believe that this has been taken into account. Unless you can demonstrate otherwise, no research has been undertaken by yourselves into the vehicular implications of such a development to the existing houses and the increased danger to the public that would arise from this.
Yours faithfully
1. The unjustified redrawing of the settlement boundary to include candidate site 4069 as it is an intrusion into scarce prime agricultural land.
2. inclusion of this site for affordable housing, is unsustainable and unviable and likely to cause significant irreversible damage to village heritage status.
The inclusion of this site fails to reflect your current planning policies and LDP objectives. It fails on the majority of Impact Sustainability objectives and should not be approved for inclusion in the final LDP. The proposed development will result in additional traffic as 25 houses will result in about 50 extra motor vehicles. This is because of the absence of a bus service for the village with the main road being over a mile from the proposed site. The existing highways in the village do not meet basic safety standards. I do not believe that this has been taken into account. Unless you can demonstrate otherwise, no research has been undertaken by yourselves into the vehicular implications of such a development to the existing houses and the increased danger to the public that would arise from this.
Yours faithfully