Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4429

Derbyniwyd: 29/01/2026

Respondent ID: 2769

Ymatebydd: Mrs Emily Ham

I object to any housing development in our village of Treoes. There is no need for additional housing or developments in our small rural village.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5524

Derbyniwyd: 09/03/2026

Respondent ID: 3275

Ymatebydd: Mrs Francesca Dixon

The same comments apply as for the alternative option for the site at Nant Canna Treoes.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5575

Derbyniwyd: 09/03/2026

Respondent ID: 3301

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Richards

There is no public transport and the site is not reasonably accessible to day-to-day services, such as medical facilities, shops and community facilities.
The proposed expansion of the site goes against the VOG’s objective to reduce the need for travel for VOG residents to meet their daily needs.
The site is in a Special Landscape Area and therefore the proposed development would be contrary to the VOG’s object to protect and enhance the VOG’s historic, built and natural environment.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 6247

Derbyniwyd: 11/03/2026

Respondent ID: 3503

Ymatebydd: Mrs Juliana Wines

I note that the sites are in a rural Vale area, far from Cowbridge and Bridgend, with a scale that is out of character with the surroundings. Residents would depend on private vehicles for commuting to work, shopping, and education, as there is no public transport to the nearest shop in Pencoed. Access is via narrow country lanes unsuitable for heavy traffic or emergency vehicles.