Glebelands at Llanmaes /
Gwrthwynebu
4 Safleoedd Ymgeisydd
ID sylw: 4412
Derbyniwyd: 28/01/2026
Respondent ID: 2758
Ymatebydd: Mr matthew white
this must not be allowed to go ahead for the following reasons:
- green belt between 2 settlements
- Llanmaes historic village needs to be protected from development, (already a conservation area)
- defamation of country side green field site with brown field sites near by (llandow, raf st athan)
- part of this land is a flood plain
- increased traffic roads cant handle amount already
- not enough services nearby to support more people (doctors, pharmacy, bus, rail)
- disruption to residents lifestyle, many people use the roads to ride horses including children riders, many cyclists use this route increased cars increased dangers
this must not be allowed to go ahead for the following reasons: green belt between 2 settlements Llanmaes historic village needs to be protected from development, (already a conservation area) defamation of country side green field site with brown field sites near by (llandow, raf st athan) part of this land is a flood plain increased traffic roads cant handle amount already not enough services nearby to support more people (doctors, pharmacy, bus, rail) disruption to residents lifestyle, many people use the roads to ride horses including children riders, many cyclists use this route increased cars increased dangers
Gwrthwynebu
4 Safleoedd Ymgeisydd
ID sylw: 4891
Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2026
Respondent ID: 1072
Ymatebydd: Mrs Linda Green
I had believed this submission previously rejected as it does not meet the criteria for development within the Vale due to size. However, to reiterate, I object to the development of this field.
I had believed this submission previously rejected as it does not meet the criteria for development within the Vale due to size
However, to reiterate, I object to the development of this field.
Gwrthwynebu
4 Safleoedd Ymgeisydd
ID sylw: 6129
Derbyniwyd: 11/03/2026
Respondent ID: 1702
Ymatebydd: Ms Ann Barnaby
Totally agree with the Vale Planners assessment this is not a suitable site for additional housing for many planning reasons
Totally agree with the Vale Planners assessment this is not a suitable site for additional housing for many planning reasons