1 Vale of Glamorgan Deposit Replacement Local Development Plan

Search representations

Results for Vale of Glamorgan Council Conservative Group search

New search New search

Object

1 Vale of Glamorgan Deposit Replacement Local Development Plan

What Will Happen After the Consultation?

Representation ID: 6507

Received: 11/03/2026

Respondent ID: 3614

Respondent: Vale of Glamorgan Council Conservative Group

Agent: Councillor George Carroll

Sound? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Our Group has been approached by residents from across the Vale of Glamorgan expressing deep concerns regarding the consultation process. Many have found the consultation portal difficult to navigate, and relevant information hard to locate. Given the time required to read all the relevant documents prior to crafting a response, residents do not feel the six-week consultation process is sufficient. As a Group, we agree. For this reason, at Full Council on Monday, I requested extension to the consultation period. It is regrettable this was not granted.
As such, it is the view of our Group that the consultation is flawed. We therefore believe that it must be carried out again.

Full text:

I write regarding the ongoing consultation relating to the Deposit Plan. I make these representations in my capacity as Leader of the Council's Conservative Group. Please take this correspondence as our Group's response to the consultation.

Our Group does not consider any of the key sites designated within the Plan to be suitable. The respective ward members for St Athan, Rhoose, Illtyd and Dinas Powys have articulated detailed reasons for this previously. I too, as ward member for Llandough, have raised concerns regarding the impacts developing the Cardiff Road site would have on road safety issues at the Merrie Harrier junction.

Our Group has been approached by residents from across the Vale of Glamorgan expressing deep concerns regarding the consultation process. Many have found the consultation portal difficult to navigate, and relevant information hard to locate. Given the time required to read all the relevant documents prior to crafting a response, residents do not feel the six-week consultation process is sufficient. As a Group, we agree. For this reason, at Full Council on Monday, I requested extension to the consultation period. It is regrettable this was not granted.

As such, it is the view of our Group that the consultation is flawed. We therefore believe that it must be carried out again.

Thank you for taking the time to consider our representations.

Attachments:

Object

1 Vale of Glamorgan Deposit Replacement Local Development Plan

HG1 - HOUSING ALLOCATIONS

Representation ID: 6509

Received: 11/03/2026

Respondent ID: 3614

Respondent: Vale of Glamorgan Council Conservative Group

Agent: Councillor George Carroll

Sound? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Our Group does not consider any of the key sites designated within the Plan to be suitable. The respective ward members for St Athan, Rhoose, Illtyd and Dinas Powys have articulated detailed reasons for this previously.

Full text:

I write regarding the ongoing consultation relating to the Deposit Plan. I make these representations in my capacity as Leader of the Council's Conservative Group. Please take this correspondence as our Group's response to the consultation.

Our Group does not consider any of the key sites designated within the Plan to be suitable. The respective ward members for St Athan, Rhoose, Illtyd and Dinas Powys have articulated detailed reasons for this previously. I too, as ward member for Llandough, have raised concerns regarding the impacts developing the Cardiff Road site would have on road safety issues at the Merrie Harrier junction.

Our Group has been approached by residents from across the Vale of Glamorgan expressing deep concerns regarding the consultation process. Many have found the consultation portal difficult to navigate, and relevant information hard to locate. Given the time required to read all the relevant documents prior to crafting a response, residents do not feel the six-week consultation process is sufficient. As a Group, we agree. For this reason, at Full Council on Monday, I requested extension to the consultation period. It is regrettable this was not granted.

As such, it is the view of our Group that the consultation is flawed. We therefore believe that it must be carried out again.

Thank you for taking the time to consider our representations.

Attachments:

Object

1 Vale of Glamorgan Deposit Replacement Local Development Plan

HG1 KS2- LAND TO THE NORTH OF DINAS POWYS

Representation ID: 6510

Received: 11/03/2026

Respondent ID: 3614

Respondent: Vale of Glamorgan Council Conservative Group

Agent: Councillor George Carroll

Sound? Not specified

Representation Summary:

I, as ward member for Llandough, have raised concerns regarding the impacts developing the Cardiff Road site would have on road safety issues at the Merrie Harrier junction.

Full text:

I write regarding the ongoing consultation relating to the Deposit Plan. I make these representations in my capacity as Leader of the Council's Conservative Group. Please take this correspondence as our Group's response to the consultation.

Our Group does not consider any of the key sites designated within the Plan to be suitable. The respective ward members for St Athan, Rhoose, Illtyd and Dinas Powys have articulated detailed reasons for this previously. I too, as ward member for Llandough, have raised concerns regarding the impacts developing the Cardiff Road site would have on road safety issues at the Merrie Harrier junction.

Our Group has been approached by residents from across the Vale of Glamorgan expressing deep concerns regarding the consultation process. Many have found the consultation portal difficult to navigate, and relevant information hard to locate. Given the time required to read all the relevant documents prior to crafting a response, residents do not feel the six-week consultation process is sufficient. As a Group, we agree. For this reason, at Full Council on Monday, I requested extension to the consultation period. It is regrettable this was not granted.

As such, it is the view of our Group that the consultation is flawed. We therefore believe that it must be carried out again.

Thank you for taking the time to consider our representations.

Attachments:

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.